Analysis & data · 2026-07-26

On, Hoka and the challengers: how share is won from the athletic footwear giants

← Back to Insights

The duopoly is no longer untouchable

For decades, athletic footwear has been the territory of a handful of giants. But in recent years, brands such as On or Hoka have shown that you can grow fast and profitably by taking share from the big players — not by competing on their terms, but by redefining them.

What the challengers did differently

The pattern repeats itself: a clear, differentiated product proposition (a recognisable technology or underfoot feel), a well-defined initial audience, and brand-building that prioritises community over mass advertising. They did not try to be 'another giant'; they occupied a space the big players were not defending well.

Real size versus perception

It is easy to overestimate a challenger because of its media noise, or to underestimate a giant because of its dated image. That is why it pays to look at the real numbers: revenue, year-on-year growth and fiscal year-end, all standardised. Financial profiles separate the brand that genuinely scales from the one that merely does marketing.

The lesson for a new brand

You don't beat a giant with the same strategy and a smaller budget. You beat it by finding a segment it serves poorly and serving it better than anyone. The challengers growing today started small and focused — exactly the route that makes sense for entering this market now.

Our report includes financial profiles of the leading brands (Nike, Adidas, On, Hoka, ASICS, New Balance and European niche brands) with revenue standardised to euros, to understand who is winning, who is losing and why.